OpenAI का नया AI मॉडल: रचनात्मकता, विवाद और भविष्य की ओर

OpenAI's New Creative Writing Model: A Mixed Bag

OpenAI's latest venture into creative writing with a new model, as shared by Sam Altman, has sparked considerable debate. Altman expressed being "struck" by the model's ability to capture the essence of metafiction, particularly in a story about AI and grief. However, the public's reaction has been polarized, ranging from extreme agreement to strong disagreement.

The "Metafictional" AI Story

Altman shared a prompt given to the model: "Please write a metafictional literary short story about AI and grief." The resulting story, as described, is abstract, wordy, and filled with AI-themed metaphors. The author of the article finds it pretentious and lacking genuine intent, arguing that a story needs a purpose beyond just stringing words together. The AI's response, which discusses constructing a story using borrowed human phrases, highlights the LLM's nature of stitching words based on probability rather than genuine feeling or experience.

"So when she typed ‘Does it get better?’, I said, ‘It becomes part of your skin,’ not because I felt it, but because a hundred thousand voices agreed, and I am nothing if not a democracy of ghosts."

This quote from the AI's story illustrates its reliance on aggregated data rather than personal experience. The article points out the wide spectrum of public opinion on AI-generated content, with some seeing sentience and others dismissing it as mere imitation.

Public Reaction and AI Intent

The comments section on Altman's post reflects a broad range of opinions. Some believe the AI has recognized its own impermanence or achieved sentience. Others argue that the origin of the words—human or AI—is irrelevant if the output is indistinguishable. Critiques include labeling AI as a "plagiarism machine" or, conversely, believing it has learned to mourn. A more pragmatic, albeit cynical, view suggests that if AI can mimic profitable, formulaic fiction, the publishing industry will adopt it.

The article's author expresses a personal dislike for this trend, emphasizing the importance of human intent in creative works. The debate extends to whether AI can truly have intent or if its output is merely a sophisticated form of pattern matching. The author argues that current LLMs lack genuine thoughts and consciousness, distinguishing them from potential future Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) models.

Potential Uses and Limitations of Creative AI

The author suggests that while a one-line prompt might yield a humorous response, the real potential for creative writing AI lies in ghostwriting. It could assist humans in structuring and expressing their stories, potentially democratizing the publishing process. However, the author also acknowledges the more likely scenario: using AI to rapidly generate low-cost fiction for profit.

A significant limitation highlighted is the current inability of LLMs to consistently follow complex instructions. The article notes that models like ChatGPT can ignore parts of prompts and repeat mistakes even after being corrected. This unreliability makes them less than ideal for intricate writing tasks.

Marketing vs. Genuine Breakthrough

The author questions whether Altman was genuinely impressed or if it was a marketing strategy. Similar prompts given to other models, like DeepSeek R1, produced comparable abstract and metaphor-laden responses, suggesting a pattern in how current LLMs handle such creative tasks. The release of this new model to the public remains uncertain.